<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Radar Spots Text-Link-Ads!</title>
	<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/</link>
	<description>Increase Money Making Business Ranking By Online Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tay</title>
		<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-1170</link>
		<author>Tay</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-1170</guid>
		<description>I'm selling links on my blog. Uh oh.

I've also been rather aggressive on ranking well for the keyword 'make money blogging'. I use to appear on the front page or sometimes the second one, but now I've dropped off completely.

Did Google block me for that keyword? If so, I'm going to have to throw a tantrum. I've been working hard for that keyword. I'm holding a contest for a month of free advertising, and one of the ways to win is to link to me with 'make money blogging' as an anchor text. I suppose I did get banned for it. Urgh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m selling links on my blog. Uh oh.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also been rather aggressive on ranking well for the keyword &#8216;make money blogging&#8217;. I use to appear on the front page or sometimes the second one, but now I&#8217;ve dropped off completely.</p>
<p>Did Google block me for that keyword? If so, I&#8217;m going to have to throw a tantrum. I&#8217;ve been working hard for that keyword. I&#8217;m holding a contest for a month of free advertising, and one of the ways to win is to link to me with &#8216;make money blogging&#8217; as an anchor text. I suppose I did get banned for it. Urgh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Increase Text Link Ads Sales</title>
		<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-936</link>
		<author>How To Increase Text Link Ads Sales</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 01:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-936</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] in time, I still make more money across the board using Google Adsense and Amazon.com; however, Text-Link-Ads is really starting to climb. Realizing this, I have come up with a few tips that I will personally [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] in time, I still make more money across the board using Google Adsense and Amazon.com; however, Text-Link-Ads is really starting to climb. Realizing this, I have come up with a few tips that I will personally [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sucker</title>
		<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-921</link>
		<author>Sucker</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 18:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>I wonder why textlinkbrokers.com is still in there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why textlinkbrokers.com is still in there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: satya</title>
		<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-919</link>
		<author>satya</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 17:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-919</guid>
		<description>That's sure they have penalized but still it appears in sponsored  listing in google search for related keywords because they are paying for adwords. and also all the pages of TLA are still indexed by google (site:text-link-ads.com) i mean they penalized but have not banned it. But all those who now appear on top of that search should be given same fate by gogole. But TLA being top competitor of adsense may attract penalization...

ReviewMe won't be harmed b'coz people buy reviews not for backlinks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s sure they have penalized but still it appears in sponsored  listing in google search for related keywords because they are paying for adwords. and also all the pages of TLA are still indexed by google (site:text-link-ads.com) i mean they penalized but have not banned it. But all those who now appear on top of that search should be given same fate by gogole. But TLA being top competitor of adsense may attract penalization&#8230;</p>
<p>ReviewMe won&#8217;t be harmed b&#8217;coz people buy reviews not for backlinks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikael Rieck</title>
		<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-918</link>
		<author>Mikael Rieck</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Let us hope that this will not spread to bloggers doing paid reviews. Surely you can say that what the company pays for is the review and the traffic that is sent from the blog but on the other hand it isn't a "natural link" and might therefore be made invalid.

The only thing that will always work is writing for your readers. Good quality content that people will read and even link to will always work - no matter what Google does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us hope that this will not spread to bloggers doing paid reviews. Surely you can say that what the company pays for is the review and the traffic that is sent from the blog but on the other hand it isn&#8217;t a &#8220;natural link&#8221; and might therefore be made invalid.</p>
<p>The only thing that will always work is writing for your readers. Good quality content that people will read and even link to will always work - no matter what Google does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs For Money</title>
		<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-908</link>
		<author>Blogs For Money</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-908</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This post:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showthread.php?t=17814&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Suggests Google is executing Javascript. The owner claims to have had a redirect that was broken up in eval statements. If what he says is true, Google is definately doing something clever. It could be something as simple as loading the page in a browser, giving it x seconds and then reading the location back, and if it's been redirected, it'll use the new page. It could also be reading the DOM after executing the script as I suggested above. That's a massive change to how it used to work though, so I won't jump to any conclusions just yet! :-D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post:</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showthread.php?t=17814" >http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showthread.php?t=17814</a></p>
<p>Suggests Google is executing Javascript. The owner claims to have had a redirect that was broken up in eval statements. If what he says is true, Google is definately doing something clever. It could be something as simple as loading the page in a browser, giving it x seconds and then reading the location back, and if it&#8217;s been redirected, it&#8217;ll use the new page. It could also be reading the DOM after executing the script as I suggested above. That&#8217;s a massive change to how it used to work though, so I won&#8217;t jump to any conclusions just yet! <img src='http://sitefever.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs For Money</title>
		<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-907</link>
		<author>Blogs For Money</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-907</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;AFAIK Google doesn't execute Javascript, so it wouldn't see these links (the code that builds the links would never be executed), so pagerank would not be carried across (and as such, I don't believe Google would ever penalise for something like that - it's just advertising like their own AdSense).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, I would not be surprised at all if in the future Google started loading pages up in browsers and letting them execute javascript, and then analysing the resulting DOM (even considering elements that are visible/invisible and maybe even priority to elements "above the fold"). This would reduce the impact of people using Javascript to manipulate what Google sees (eg. spam keywords into the page, and hide them from the user with javascript). It would be more friendly to dynamically built menus/navigation and ajax sites. However, the complexity involved makes me think it's a while off yet!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFAIK Google doesn&#8217;t execute Javascript, so it wouldn&#8217;t see these links (the code that builds the links would never be executed), so pagerank would not be carried across (and as such, I don&#8217;t believe Google would ever penalise for something like that - it&#8217;s just advertising like their own AdSense).</p>
<p>However, I would not be surprised at all if in the future Google started loading pages up in browsers and letting them execute javascript, and then analysing the resulting DOM (even considering elements that are visible/invisible and maybe even priority to elements &#8220;above the fold&#8221;). This would reduce the impact of people using Javascript to manipulate what Google sees (eg. spam keywords into the page, and hide them from the user with javascript). It would be more friendly to dynamically built menus/navigation and ajax sites. However, the complexity involved makes me think it&#8217;s a while off yet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeni</title>
		<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-903</link>
		<author>jeni</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 12:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Something I forgot to ask - some ad sites like BlogAds use javascript, rather than straight links, to link to the advertiser's site. Do you know if pagerank can be "transmitted" through javascript? Or I wonder if the javascript acts as a built in "nofollow."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I forgot to ask - some ad sites like BlogAds use javascript, rather than straight links, to link to the advertiser&#8217;s site. Do you know if pagerank can be &#8220;transmitted&#8221; through javascript? Or I wonder if the javascript acts as a built in &#8220;nofollow.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Links &#60;&#60; Vandelay Website Design</title>
		<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-902</link>
		<author>Weekly Links &#60;&#60; Vandelay Website Design</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 12:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-902</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Radar Spots Text-Link-Ads from SiteFever. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Google Radar Spots Text-Link-Ads from SiteFever. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs For Money</title>
		<link>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-899</link>
		<author>Blogs For Money</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sitefever.com/internet-marketing/138-googles-radar-spots-text-link-ads/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another great observation! :D&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wonder if this has anything to do with the late pagerank update. Maybe they're making big changes to try and make their results better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@Jeni: I would hope that if you use nofollow you wouldn't be penalised in any way, because Google tell us to use nofollow on paid links. Whether or not the advertisers would be happy with that though, I don't know. It depends on whether they consider the amount they're paying include the backlinks or not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given Google's site also says paid links are a fact of the web, I'm surprised they've dumped TLA from the results like that. Especially now that &lt;a href="http://blogsformoney.com/post/Making-Money-From-Other-Sites-Misfortunes.aspx"&gt;someone else is profiting from this even more now!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great observation! <img src='http://sitefever.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I wonder if this has anything to do with the late pagerank update. Maybe they&#8217;re making big changes to try and make their results better.</p>
<p>@Jeni: I would hope that if you use nofollow you wouldn&#8217;t be penalised in any way, because Google tell us to use nofollow on paid links. Whether or not the advertisers would be happy with that though, I don&#8217;t know. It depends on whether they consider the amount they&#8217;re paying include the backlinks or not.</p>
<p>Given Google&#8217;s site also says paid links are a fact of the web, I&#8217;m surprised they&#8217;ve dumped TLA from the results like that. Especially now that <a href="http://blogsformoney.com/post/Making-Money-From-Other-Sites-Misfortunes.aspx">someone else is profiting from this even more now!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
